Strength and Love – A Discovery of Witches #3
Comments (0) 
I stayed up much too late last night reading this book – I read up through page 364 (to Chapter 28). I am officially annoyed that the next book in this series will not be released until next year. I’m not a fan of waiting, but am willing to do so if she keeps up the quality of the writing (as I expect she will). I may have to tackle her non-fiction books too.
One thing has been bugging me – she writes “a historian” instead of “an historian” – this looks wrong to me. What you you think? Is she right? How do you say it when you read these words aloud – is the “h” silent? Grammar Girl agrees with her (as do most style books, apparently) so I guess that’s five points from Gryffindor (sorry – couldn’t resist an HP reference), but her way still looks wrong.
The paragraphs below contains spoilers and speculation about the rest of this book/series, so do not scroll down if you don’t want to know. 
If you are still reading, I guess you are either reading the book with me, or you don’t mind spoilers (I’m with you – spoilers don’t bother me one bit!) I have made it to the love story – the witch and the vampire are in love with each other, but their relationship violates a treaty between all non-human creatures, so their lives are now in danger. Diana is a very strong women, but vampires are pack animals, and there can only be one alpha, so things are going to get tricky. From a feminist perspective, what do you think about books that require strong women to become submissive in order to achieve true love?
What is it with vampires? They are physically perfect, but they’re PREDATORS, and they could accidentally kill you even if they love you. At least Diana is a witch, so she might be able to hold her own against them if she needs to. And because the vampires in books are very old, they hold onto ancient traditions, particularly the ones where women must be taken care of and protected, even if this means locking them away from the rest of the world – what is the appeal today? Are women drawn to that kind of chivalry in literature even as we are repulsed by it in real life? Are we repulsed by it in real life? So many questions about gender roles come to mind as I read, particularly given that the lead female in this book is a highly respected scholar who has made a name for herself in her career – does she surrender her career now that she belongs to a vampire? She’s still working in the book, and I’m excited to see where Harkness takes this.
I can’t help but think that Diana is going to become a vampire (I guess we’ll find out in a couple of years when the trilogy is complete). That would make the “Congregation” leave them alone, because they would no longer be breaking the treaty, and it would continue their lovely romance into “happily ever after – ever after” territory. (Otherwise, she alone will eventually die.) Other witches have become vampires at the expense of their powers, but she might be the most powerful witch of all time, so does that mean she gets to keep her powers? Also, her vampire is a geneticist, so he might be able to do something with her DNA to help her keep her powers when/if she becomes a vampire.
I have course prep to accomplish tonight, and many papers/exams to grade, but I’ll to try to squeeze in some reading time too – can’t wait to see what happens next!
